Commonwealth v. Bundy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting claim that trial counsel was ineffective because he met with the defendant only once before trial because the “time devoted to attorney-client consultations affords no basis for inferring the total extent of trial preparation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Elliott
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-11-21· cited 165×
• Commonwealth v. Poindexter
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-08-25· cited 78×
• Commonwealth v. Brooks
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-12-30· cited 73×
• Commonwealth v. Mason
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-11-24· cited 48×
• Commonwealth v. Harvey
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-12-20· cited 45×
• Commonwealth v. Thomas
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-02-24· cited 40×
• Commonwealth v. Breakiron
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-04-09· cited 24×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Owens
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-11-26· cited 67×
• Commonwealth v. Bundy
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-11-20· cited 64×
• Commonwealth v. Bundy
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-10-05· cited 12×