Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Bridges

Citations

  • 886 A.2d 1127
  • 584 Pa. 589
  • 2005 Pa. LEXIS 2590

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that counsel’s performance was adequate and that counsel’s apparent failure not to further investigate Bridges’ childhood was “a reasonable strategic decision”
  • holding that trial counsel’s performance at sentencing was not deficient
  • affirming PCRA court’s denial of expert funds because appellant “failed to prove the witnesses would provide the desired information”
  • noting that same claim was previously litigated on direct appeal
  • rejecting as meritless a claim of ineffectiveness premised on a previously litigated claim
  • unpleasant childhood factors counsel was aware of would have detracted from mitigation evidence trial counsel did present

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cappy, Castille, Nigro, Newman, Saylor, Eakin, Baer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.