Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Howard

Citations

  • 719 A.2d 233
  • 553 Pa. 266
  • 1998 Pa. LEXIS 2135

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that counsel will not be deemed ineffective where his conduct is supported by a reasonable basis
  • rejecting for lack of actual prejudice claim that counsel was 3 This “no-adverse-inference” instruction, so called, is contained in the Pennsylvania Suggested Standard Criminal Jury Instructions and provides as follows: 3.10A (Crim
  • counsel not ineffective where no evidence counsel had notice appellant had any mental illness
  • counsel not ineffective where no evidence counsel had notice appellant had any mental illness
  • counsel not ineffective where no evidence counsel had notice appellant had any mental illness
  • counsel not ineffective where no evidence counsel had notice appellant had any mental illness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaherty, Zappala, Cappy, Castille, Nigro, Newman, Saylor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

52 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.