Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2/22/1989
Commonwealth v. Bradley
Citations
- 554 A.2d 127
- 381 Pa. Super. 528
- 1989 Pa. Super. LEXIS 240
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- disapproving the practice of entering sentence before a defendant has had the opportunity to file post-verdict motions, particularly where the accused has not been apprised of his rights
- disapproving the practice of entering sentence before a defendant has had the opportunity to file post-verdict motions, particularly where the accused has not been apprised of his rights
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Olszewski, Kelly, Hester
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. JaremaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-04-26· cited 18×
- Commonwealth v. YetsickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-03-15· cited 13×
- Commonwealth v. FormanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-05-13· cited 11×
- School District of Monessen v. Farnham & Pfile Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-06-29· cited 6×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Commonwealth v. KochSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-07-02· cited 93×
- Commonwealth v. KinseySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-06-29· cited 49×
- Commonwealth v. PickerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-12-29· cited 30×
- Commonwealth v. RagoliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-04-13· cited 29×
- Commonwealth v. IveySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-10-29· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.