Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Koch

Citations

  • 431 A.2d 1052
  • 288 Pa. Super. 290
  • 1981 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2957

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding Pa.R.Crim.P. 1123 applicable to trials of summary cases
  • finding “based both on the nature of the offense, and the facts and circumstances of [the] case, a remand, although the preferred procedure, would not be in the interest of judicial economy and expediency[.]”
  • continuous barking of dogs housed in kennel in rural community is not “of such a nature as to ‘break the public peace’ ”
  • summary violations warrant prompt disposition, and the rules of criminal procedure are geared toward that goal
  • post-verdict motions required to preserve issues for appeal following de novo trial in summary cases
  • post-verdict motions are required to preserve issues for appeal following a de novo trial in summary cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cercone, Price, Spaeth, Hester, Cavanaugh, Montgomery, Hoffman, Cava-Naugh

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

73 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.