Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Boyd

Citations

  • 835 A.2d 812
  • 2003 Pa. Super. 412
  • 2003 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3750

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “by permitting Appellant to file a supplement, and in considering the supplement, the PCRA court effectively allowed Appellant to amend his petition to include those issues presented in the supplement”
  • holding that “by permitting Appellant to file a supplement, and in considering the supplement, the PCRA court effectively allowed Appellant to amend his petition to include those issues presented in the supplement”
  • holding that “by permitting Appellant to file a supplement, and in considering the supplement, the PCRA court effectively allowed Appellant to amend his petition to include those issues presented in the supplement”
  • holding that “by permitting [the a]ppellant to file a supplement, and in considering the supplement, the PCRA court effectively allowed [the a]ppellant to amend his petition to include those issues presented in the supplement”
  • holding that where a PCRA court denied a petition to amend, but later accepted and considered the amended petition on its merits, the PCRA court “effectively allowed Appellant to amend his petition to include those issues presented in the supplement” pursuant to Rule 905(a)
  • holding that where a PCRA court denied a petition to amend, but later accepted and considered the amended filing on its merits, the PCRA court “effectively allowed Appellant to amend his petition to include those issues presented in the supplement” pursuant to Rule 905(A)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hudock, Bender, Tamilia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.