Commonwealth v. Bousquet

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting contention that prosecutor required to instruct grand jurors on differences between murder in first degree and second degree and manslaughter
• affirming transfer, especially in view of \heinous nature\ of crime charged
• decision not to call expert did not amount to ineffective assistance of counsel where evidence overwhelmingly demonstrated that defendant was capable of possessing requisite intent
• \[T]he question was one of credibility for the finder of fact and we shall not substitute our judgment for that of the trial judge\
• \[T]he question was one of credibility for the finder of fact and we shall not substitute our judgment for that of the trial judge\
• transfer proper where counsel on notice of nature of hearing and \had a sufficient basis to conclude that the interests of the public required transfer\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).