Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Benoit

Citations

  • 410 N.E.2d 347
  • 410 Mass. 506
  • 1991 Mass. LEXIS 341

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ruling that judge did not err in failing to rule on the voluntariness of the defendant’s statements because the issue was not presented to the judge
  • voir dire on voluntariness of statement not required unless defendant first raises issue of voluntariness of admission or confes sion
  • § 20B does not “disqualify a psychotherapist from testifying” where defendant “failed to make any attempt to exercise the statutory privilege at trial”
  • injuries to defendant’s wrists did not raise issue of voluntariness, even in combination with evidence of intoxication and mental illness
  • no live issue of voluntariness where judge lacked substantial evidence of defendant’s insanity at time he made statements
  • “A confession [or admission], whether made to police or to a civilian, is admissible only if it is voluntarily made”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Abrams, Greaney, Liacos, O'Connor, Wilkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.