Massachusetts Appeals Court· 5/21/1987

Commonwealth v. Baldwin

Citations

509 N.E.2d 4
24 Mass. App. Ct. 200
1987 Mass. App. LEXIS 1939

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

touching vulva or labia intrusive enough for wrongful penetration of vagina
new trial warranted where “diagnosis” of “sexual molestation,” term “synonymous to laymen with indecent assault and battery,” was not redacted
admission of so much of hospital record that contained “diagnosis” of “sexual molestation” was error entitling defendant to new trial
intrusion into the vagina itself is not required to make out wrongful penetration; touching of vulva or labia sufficient
“Intrusion into the vagina itself is not required to make out the wrongful penetration. Touching by the male of the vulva or labia ... is intrusion enough”
“Intrusion into the vagina itself is not required to make out the wrongful penetration”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Perretta, Quirico, Kass

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.