Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Baker

Citations

  • 507 A.2d 872
  • 352 Pa. Super. 260
  • 1986 Pa. Super. LEXIS 10227

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “self-serving or uncorroborated statements on petitioner’s behalf do not shift and do not necessarily sustain petitioner’s burden of proof, even when the Commonwealth presents no rebuttal evidence” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brosky, Johnson, Lipez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.