Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Baez

Citations

  • 21 A.3d 1280
  • 2011 Pa. Super. 109
  • 2011 Pa. Super. LEXIS 617
  • 2011 WL 1957697

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, a defendant’s indication he or she understood his or her rights and then proceeded to answer questions was sufficient - 33 - J-A29018-22 manifestation of intent to waive his or her rights
  • holding “cause shown” to support trial court acceptance of nunc pro tunc suppression motion consisted of belated receipt of supplemental discovery report warranting suppression motion
  • explaining that an “explicit waiver” of one’s Miranda rights is required under Pennsylvania law as demonstrated by “‘an outward manifestation of a waiver such as an oral, written or physical manifestation.’”
  • affirming trial court’s acceptance of nunc pro tunc suppression motion where “cause shown” was receipt of supplemental discovery report warranting suppression motion
  • defendant need not execute written waiver to expressly waive rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bender, Donohue, Ott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.