Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Andrews

Citations

  • 213 A.3d 1004

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the “complete failure to file the [court-ordered Rule] 1925(b) statement … [and the] untimely filing [of a Rule 1925(b
  • stating that this Court continues to apply cases like Wallace that applied the statute that preceded Rule 600 in Rule 600 cases
  • stating that this Court continues to apply cases like Wallace that were decided under Rule 1100
  • finding that a defendant’s late pretrial motion for discretionary discovery, which “placed an obligation on the prosecution that required the delay of the trial’s commencement,” was excludable for Rule 600 purposes
  • explaining that this Court declined to find waiver where the trial court addressed the defendant’s issues despite counsel’s failure to file a timely statement of errors as that failure is per se ineffective assistance
  • declining to find the appellant’s claims waived pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 1925(c)(3) and declining to remand to the trial court because the trial court addressed the issues raised in the appellant’s untimely 1925(b) statement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lazarus, McLAUGHLIN, Stevens

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.