Skip to main content
· 4/18/2002

Commercial Coin Laundry Systems v. Enneking

Citations

  • 766 N.E.2d 433
  • 2002 Ind. App. LEXIS 599
  • 2002 WL 595051

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a \party attacking the judgment of a sister state has the burden of rebutting the presumption of validity and of showing that the sister state lacked jurisdiction\
  • reflecting the areas of dispute between the IRS and the Estate, but not reflecting any intent to tax Policy proceeds or any admission by the Estate that such proceeds were taxable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robb, Kirsch, Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.