Skip to main content
· 6/17/1998

Fisher v. Estate of Haley

Citations

  • 695 N.E.2d 1022
  • 1998 Ind. App. LEXIS 994
  • 1998 WL 317862

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that although the plaintiff was not a direct party to the action, because he stood to gain from a judgment for retained corporate earnings, he was therefore a \party to the issue\
  • interpreting prior version of statute that was virtually identical to current one

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ratliff, Sharpnack, Staton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.