Federal Claims· 11/7/2001
Combs v. United States
Citations
- 50 Fed. Cl. 592
- 2001 U.S. Claims LEXIS 206
- 2001 WL 1455939
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting plaintiff's argument that he should be paid at E-6 pay rate when Air Force forms so indicated because statute made clear that plaintiff was entitled to only E-1 pay rate
- rejecting plaintiff's argument that he should be paid at E-6 pay rate when Air Force forms so indicated because statute made clear that plaintiff was entitled to only E-1 pay rate
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gibson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. HowellCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2016-07-19· cited 65×
- United States v. FischerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2005-09-02· cited 39×
- United States v. DodgeAir Force Court of Criminal Appeals· 2005-01-26· cited 8×
- United States v. HowellNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 2015-12-29
- Stewart v. MabusDistrict of Columbia· 2016-02-24
- United States v. BrownNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 2016-03-31
- Howell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2016-07-19
- United States v. GuardadoCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2020-01-15
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court· 1988-06-17· cited 2,587×
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court· 1985-03-20· cited 1,823×
- Office of Personnel Management v. RichmondSupreme Court· 1990-08-13· cited 1,177×
- United States v. LarionoffSupreme Court· 1977-06-13· cited 805×
- Colonel David W. Palmer, II v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 1999-02-23· cited 475×
- Goldman v. WeinbergerSupreme Court· 1986-03-25· cited 421×
- Clinton v. GoldsmithSupreme Court· 1999-05-17· cited 374×
- Bradley v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1973-03-05· cited 261×
- Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1961-05-22· cited 232×
- United States v. GorskiCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 1997-11-18· cited 124×
- Todd A. Dock, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 1995-03-09· cited 38×
- United States v. CombsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 1997-09-30· cited 28×
- Hoskins v. United StatesFederal Claims· 1998-01-27· cited 23×
- Keys v. ColeUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1990-09-27· cited 23×
- United States v. WashingtonAir Force Court of Criminal Appeals· 1995-04-21· cited 20×
- Chandler v. StatesFederal Claims· 2000-06-22· cited 10×
- Jimmy N. Armstrong v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 1997-07-30· cited 4×
- Johnson v. United StatesFederal Claims· 1998-07-02· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.