Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 4/22/2024
Com. v. Rosario, D.
Citations
- 314 A.3d 888
- 2024 Pa. Super. 78
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- requiring satisfaction of the three-part ineffectiveness test where counsel is allegedly ineffective for failing to file a Rule 600 motion
- analyzing an ineffectiveness claim in connection with a Rule 600 issue under the three-prong test where the issue was not framed as ineffectiveness causing an involuntary guilty plea
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stevens
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Commonwealth v. SpotzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-01-17· cited 986×
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-03-18· cited 958×
- Commonwealth v. SneedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-06-04· cited 398×
- Commonwealth v. RiveraSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2010-12-17· cited 394×
- Commonwealth v. PresleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-07-17· cited 181×
- Commonwealth v. HowardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-10-01· cited 149×
- Commonwealth v. GoldmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-07-12· cited 125×
- Com. v. Prater, W.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2021-07-09· cited 89×
- Commonwealth v. ReedSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-02-27· cited 72×
- Com. v. Rosario, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2024-04-22· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.