Skip to main content

Com. v. Crawford, C.

Citations

  • 254 A.3d 769
  • 2021 Pa. Super. 102

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the prohibited conduct in a law criminalizing impersonation of a veteran for profit was unprotected as a form of fraud
  • stating that a claim that a sentencing court relied on improper factors raises a substantial question
  • “[I]mpersonation done with the intent to obtain some benefit *** is a form of fraud, which has historically been unprotected speech under the First Amendment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pellegrini

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.