Skip to main content
· 4/18/2008

COM., OFFICE OF COMPTROLLER v. Barker

Citations

  • 659 S.E.2d 502
  • 275 Va. 529
  • 2008 Va. LEXIS 48

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating matters of statutory interpretation are reviewed de novo on appeal
  • “The plain language . . . is in the disjunctive, not the conjunctive, and indicates the listed medical conditions are to be considered separately.”
  • “evidence proving a causal connection must be ‘sufficient to take the question out of the realm of mere conjecture, or speculation, and into the realm of legitimate inference’ ” (quoting Cohn v. Knowledge Connections, Inc., 266 Va. 362, 369, 585 S.E.2d 578, 582 (2003

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: G. Steven Agee

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.