Cohn v. Knowledge Connections, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• listing these requirements and noting that constructive fraud differs from actual fraud in that the misrepresentation is made innocently or negligently
• applying the invited error doctrine because the defendant agreed to the appealed ruling
• court cannot grant motions to strike or JNOV’s “[i]f reasonable people may differ in their conclusions or if a conclusion is based on the weight to be given to the testimony” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).