Collucci v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “substantive rights may not be amended retrospectively by legislative enactment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Comind, Companhia De Seguros v. Sikorsky Aircraft Division of United Technologies Corp.
  D. Connecticut· 1987-01-14· cited 23×
• Savona v. General Motors Corp.
  D. Connecticut· 1985-05-16· cited 5×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.
  Supreme Court· 1941-06-02· cited 8,668×
• Jones Destruction, Inc. v. Upjohn
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1971-05-11· cited 100×
• Prokolkin v. General Motors Corporation
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1976-03-02· cited 90×
• American Masons' Supply Co. v. F. W. Brown Co.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1978-02-07· cited 75×
• Diamond National Corp. v. Dwelle
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1973-04-03· cited 68×
• Cersosimo v. Cersosimo
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1982-09-14· cited 50×
• Hunter v. Hunter
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1979-04-17· cited 37×
• Michaud v. Fitzryk
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1961-06-09· cited 26×
• East Village Associates, Inc. v. Town of Monroe
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1977-07-26· cited 25×
• Brown v. MERROW MACHINE COMPANY
  D. Connecticut· 1976-04-01· cited 10×