Skip to main content

Collins v. State

Citations

  • 873 N.E.2d 149
  • 2007 Ind. App. LEXIS 2075
  • 2007 WL 2622717

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that statements identifying shooter were nontesti-monial when made by agitated declarant during 911 call shortly after he had witnessed shooting
  • holding that Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 18A-CR-2458 | April 30, 2019 Page 13 of 15 anger alone is not sufficient to support an instruction on sudden heat
  • finding that defendant’s statement, “I probably need an attorney,” was an observation rendered equivocal by the use of the word “probably”
  • noting that anger alone is not sufficient to support an instruction on sudden heat

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bradford, Najam, Mathias

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.