Indiana Court of Appeals· 9/12/2007
Collins v. State
Citations
- 873 N.E.2d 149
- 2007 Ind. App. LEXIS 2075
- 2007 WL 2622717
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that statements identifying shooter were nontesti-monial when made by agitated declarant during 911 call shortly after he had witnessed shooting
- holding that Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 18A-CR-2458 | April 30, 2019 Page 13 of 15 anger alone is not sufficient to support an instruction on sudden heat
- finding that defendant’s statement, “I probably need an attorney,” was an observation rendered equivocal by the use of the word “probably”
- noting that anger alone is not sufficient to support an instruction on sudden heat
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bradford, Najam, Mathias
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Kimbrough v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2009-08-13· cited 90×
- Wright v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2008-03-04· cited 49×
- Massey v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2011-10-19· cited 47×
- Steven E. Malloch v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2012-12-21· cited 19×
- Wright v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2009-11-10· cited 15×
- Christopher M. Montgomery v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2014-11-21· cited 13×
- State v. SolizNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2009-06-12· cited 12×
- Ryan E. Bean v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2012-08-22· cited 12×
- State v. MartinIndiana Court of Appeals· 2008-04-25· cited 8×
- Bean v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2009-09-09· cited 8×
- Ludina Roshida Wallace v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2017-07-25· cited 5×
- Marshall v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-10-27· cited 2×
- Jason King v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2013-07-25· cited 2×
- Gayle Fischer v. Michael and Noel HeymannIndiana Court of Appeals· 2013-06-07· cited 1×
- Nathan Anderson v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2012-01-31
- Beth Montgomery v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals· 2016-12-02
- Bruce Dewayne Thomas, III v. State of Indiana (mem. dec,)Indiana Court of Appeals· 2017-06-28
- Michael Anthony Jones v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals· 2017-11-02
- Elijah J. Colon Cruz v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2023-09-28
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1981-06-22· cited 6,931×
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2006-06-19· cited 4,179×
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1994-06-24· cited 2,777×
- Harris v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1971-11-16· cited 200×
- Hall v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2006-06-20· cited 162×
- Townsend v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1994-04-18· cited 106×
- Taylor v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1997-12-03· cited 98×
- Washington v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2004-05-20· cited 95×
- Wilson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1998-07-17· cited 83×
- Wright v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1958-01-30· cited 63×
- Indianapolis Downs, LLC v. HerrIndiana Court of Appeals· 2005-09-20· cited 58×
- Afolabi v. Atlantic Mortgage & Investment Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals· 2006-06-29· cited 55×
- Matheney v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1992-01-09· cited 55×
- Davies v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2000-06-15· cited 44×
- Wright v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2002-04-29· cited 44×
- Sauerheber v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1998-09-01· cited 41×
- Hyppolite v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2002-09-06· cited 37×
- Brown v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1964-09-28· cited 32×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.