Skip to main content

Coleman v. State

Citations

  • 788 S.W.2d 369
  • 1990 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 61
  • 1990 WL 50910

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that, if a request for severance “is timely, the defendant’s right to a severance is absolute, and 9 severance is mandatory”
  • discussing the difference between a motion for election and a motion to sever
  • proper when offenses alleged in separate charging instruments are tried at the same time. Tex. Penal Code § 3.02(b). 2 § 3.04(c
  • where appellant's motion did not apprise the trial court that it was a motion to sever offenses for separate trials, appellant's right to severance was waived
  • where appellant's motion did not apprise the trial court that it was a motion to sever offenses for separate trials, appellant's right to severance was waived
  • where appellant's motion did not apprise the trial court that it was a motion to sever offenses for separate trials, appellant's right to severance was waived

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.