Skip to main content

Cole v. State

Citations

  • 714 So. 2d 479
  • 1998 WL 282807

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • providing a detailed discussion and overview of the Marchman Act's structure, including its court-ordered involuntary admission provisions
  • quashing an adjudication of contempt as fundamental error because the allegations on which the order to show cause was based—a letter from an addiction counselor and written report of a drug screen—were not sworn as required by rule 3.840(a)
  • \A writ of habeas corpus may be employed to secure the release of a person who is being unlawfully detained.\
  • “A writ of habeas corpus may be employed to secure the release of a person who is being unlawfully, detained.”
  • “A writ of habeas corpus may be employed to secure the release of a person who is being unlawfully detained.”
  • appeal of conviction and sentence premature because they had not been rendered by the filing of a signed written order, but appellate jurisdiction vested once the order was rendered

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Northcutt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.