Cohen v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to apply collateral estoppel for policy reasons consistent with Restatement (Second) of Judgments § 28
• declining to apply collateral estoppel for policy reasons consistent with Restatement (Second) of Judgments § 28
• collateral estoppel requires, inter alia, that the precluded issue is identical to one that was presented in a prior case
• “[T]he determination of disability for purposes of workers’ compensation benefits [is] to be made within that scheme, as opposed to by a local civil service commission.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).