Pieper v. Ametek-Thermox Instruments Division

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “a termination of benefits must go hand-in-hand with a termination of the liability of an employer”
• setting forth a review of the case law and relevant provisions of the Act governing suspension of workers’ compensation benefits
• absent the termination of benefits by order of competent authority or final receipt, it is presumed that the liability of the Employer for the work-related injury continues
• “In such suspension situations, the causal connection between the original work-related injury and the disability which gave rise to compensation is presumed.”
• a claimant is entitled to reinstatement where his/her increased loss of earning power is through no fault of his/her own

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).