Cochran v. Cochran

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court erred when it did not consider “what the husband could have been reasonably expected to have earned ... based upon the recent work history and other pertinent circumstances
• “[W]hen one makes a job change to the detriment of one’s family, it is not the family who should suffer but the one who made the job change.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Gottlieb v. Gottlieb
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1994-09-27· cited 125×
• Calvert v. Calvert
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1994-08-09· cited 88×
• Amanda Swanson Niblett v. Jason Daniel Niblett
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2015-12-15· cited 60×
• Pullen v. Pullen
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2009-12-24· cited 50×
• Reece v. Reece
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1996-04-30· cited 46×
• Brooks v. Rogers
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1994-07-05· cited 25×
• Hamel v. Hamel
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1994-03-08· cited 14×
• Mitzenmacher v. Mitzenmacher
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-04-12· cited 14×
• Dueling v. Dueling
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1999-10-15· cited 12×
• Gossett v. Gossett
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 2000-10-20· cited 8×
• Rutledge v. Rutledge
  Spotsylvania County Circuit Court· 1996-10-07
• Callahan v. Crupper
  Loudoun County Circuit Court· 1997-08-06

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Antonelli v. Antonelli
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1991-09-20· cited 115×
• Blank v. Blank
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1990-03-13· cited 108×
• Jamison v. Jamison
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1987-02-03· cited 39×
• Hawkins v. Hawkins
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1948-04-26· cited 15×
• Butler v. Butler
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1976-09-02· cited 12×