Amanda Swanson Niblett v. Jason Daniel Niblett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing that “all [circuit] court rulings come to an appellate court with a presumption of correctness”
• remanding a child support calculation because the circuit “court erred in failing to first consider recent past earnings to calculate the amount of income that should be imputed to father because of his voluntary unemployment”
• finding incarcerated father voluntarily unemployed for child support purposes because “a parent should not be permitted ‘to shift to his wife and children the consequences of his wrongdoing’” (quoting Layman v. Layman, 25 Va. App. 365, 368 (1997))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).