Coats v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• validity of administrative rule is at issue upon BOLFs enforcement of rule, which had not occurred in that case
• “When a question of subject matter jurisdiction presents itself at any stage of a proceeding, whether on the motion of a party or on the court’s own motion, it is the court’s duty to address it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Homestyle Direct, LLC v. Department of Human Services
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2013-10-03· cited 25×
• Oregon Restaurant Services, Inc. v. Oregon State Lottery
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-05-18· cited 10×
• Coats v. State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-06-12· cited 9×
• State v. Hill
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-04-20· cited 8×
• Coats-Sellers v. State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-03-10· cited 3×
• Homestyle Direct, LLC v. Department of Human Services
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-09-21· cited 2×
• Coats-Sellers v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-11-15· cited 1×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Dippold v. Cathlamet Timber Co.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1920-12-07· cited 58×
• Hay v. Oregon Department of Transportation
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1986-05-20· cited 53×
• Alto v. State Fire Marshal
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1994-07-29· cited 18×
• Vulcan Arbor Hill Corp. v. Reich
  D.C. Circuit· 1996-04-19· cited 14×
• City of Lake Oswego v. Mylander
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1986-06-03· cited 11×
• Coats v. State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-09-27· cited 7×