Hay v. Oregon Department of Transportation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• describing the court’s jurisdiction as dependent on whether the proceeding is or is not a contested case
• describing jurisdiction to review agency orders as depending on whether proceeding is contested or noncontested
• describing jurisdiction to review agency orders as depending on whether proceeding is contested or noncontested
• parking on beach was not a private nuisance because, in part, the “history of vehicular traffic on the beach,” which dated back over 80 years, “demonstrates that the parking * * * was not unreasonable as a matter of law”
• although Oregon courts may give some degree of respect to an agency’s interpretation of a statute, question ultimately is one for the court
• challenge to expired agency rule dismissed as moot even though agency could readopt the rule at “ ‘any time it chooses’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).