District Court of Appeal of Florida· 3/14/1990
Cleveland v. State
Citations
- 557 So. 2d 959
- 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1531
- 1990 WL 26221
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that un-Miran-dized statements to a probation and restitution center counselor were admissible in a probation revocation proceeding
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dell, Polen, Walden
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court· 1984-07-03· cited 8,014×
- State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida· 1986-07-17· cited 2,703×
- State v. GreenSupreme Court of Florida· 1989-07-20· cited 195×
- Grubbs v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1979-07-26· cited 115×
- State v. DoddSupreme Court of Florida· 1982-09-02· cited 41×
- State v. CrossSupreme Court of Florida· 1986-05-01· cited 28×
- Braxton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-05-13· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.