Cleveland v. Colby

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a Facebook user had no reasonable expectation of privacy that his Facebook friends would not share the information that the user posted on Facebook
• holding that a defendant in a criminal racketeering case surrendered his expectation of privacy when he disseminated photos and other content to his Facebook site, even though privacy settings allowed viewership only by \friends\
• denying suppression motion after finding defendant “surrendered his expectation of privacy” by sharing posts with his Facebook friends
• denying suppression motion after finding defendant “surrendered his expectation of privacy” by sharing posts with his Facebook friends
• “When a social media user disseminates his postings and information to the public, they are not protected by the Fourth Amendment.”
• “When [defendant] posted to his Facebook profile and then shared those posts with his ‘friends,’ he did so at his peril”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).