Skip to main content
· 5/23/2012

Wymsylo v. Bartec, Inc.

Citations

  • 2012 Ohio 2187
  • 132 Ohio St. 3d 167
  • 970 N.E.2d 898

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that an \ 'administrative rule cannot add [to] or subtract from the legislative enactment' \
  • applying federal regulatory takings jurisprudence and determining that the regulation in question did not result in “the type of taking contemplated by either the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution or the Ohio Constitution, Article I, Section 19”
  • applying federal regulatory takings jurisprudence and determining that the regulation in question did not result in “the type of taking contemplated by either the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution or the Ohio Constitution, Article I, Section 19”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lanzinger, O'Connor, Pfeifer, Stratton, Cupp, Brown, O'Donnell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.