Skip to main content

Clements v. State

Citations

  • 19 S.W.3d 442
  • 2000 Tex. App. LEXIS 1241
  • 2000 WL 210453

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that stalking statute was not overbroad as placing victim in fear of bodily injury was not constitutionally protected activity
  • indicating that current statute addressed Long court’s overbreadth concerns by prohibiting only conduct causing fear of bodily injury or death, which fell outside First Amendment protection, and by requiring nexus among all acts constituting offense
  • indicating that current statute addressed Long court’s overbreadth concerns by prohibiting only conduct causing fear of bodily injury or death, which fell outside First Amendment protection, and by requiring nexus among all acts constituting offense
  • requiring, to avoid vagueness challenge, that criminal statute provide such notice
  • requiring, to avoid vagueness challenge, that criminal statute provide such notice
  • applying plain meaning of “follow” in context of legal-sufficiency review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Michael H. Schneider

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.