Skip to main content

Cleary v. State

Citations

  • 663 N.E.2d 779
  • 1996 Ind. App. LEXIS 411
  • 1996 WL 179910

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that prison inmates do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their cells because privacy is incompatible with the need to maintain security by close surveillance of inmates
  • holding that prison inmates do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their cells because privacy is incompatible with the need to maintain security by close surveillance of inmates

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sharpnack, Hoffman, Rucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.