Clayton v. McCullough

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “we are not bound by § 876(b) of the Restatement 2d, as it has not been adopted by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court”
• passenger and driver of car had no agency relationship so that negligence of latter would be imputed to former
• no recovery was possible under section 876 where there were no factual averments indicating that the passenger gave substantial assistance or encouragement to the driver to engage in tortious conduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).