Welc v. Porter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff, who was injured in a motor vehicle accident with a drunk driver, could not recover from the drunk driver’s passenger, as an aider or abetter under section 876(b
• stating that “[a]lthough [§§ 876(a) and (b) ] have been addressed by this Court, ... these pronouncements are not controlling as the discussions either did not command a majority or constituted dicta. Moreover, these sections heretofore have not been expressly adopted.”
• minor passenger in a vehicle did not owe duty to third person or other passengers to protect from negligent acts of the driver, absent existence of a special relationship, joint enterprise, joint venture or right to control the vehicle

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).