Skip to main content
· 3/16/2006

Clayton v. Eli Lilly and Co.

Citations

  • 421 F. Supp. 2d 77
  • 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10309
  • 2006 WL 658854

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that Alabama law applied because plaintiff, diagnosed in Puerto Rico, was exposed to the drug there

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Urbina

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.