· 3/16/2006
Clayton v. Eli Lilly and Co.
Citations
- 421 F. Supp. 2d 77
- 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10309
- 2006 WL 658854
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that Alabama law applied because plaintiff, diagnosed in Puerto Rico, was exposed to the drug there
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Urbina
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.