Class v. Carter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that if counterclaims were permitted in FED actions, “the object the legislature had in view— summary determination of possessory disputes — would be frustrated”
• in an FED proceeding, “[t]he judgment is for restitution of the premises and nothing more”
• conclusion that legislature did not intend to authorize counterclaims in commercial forcible entry and detainer (FED
• FED proceedings are “designed to be quick and summary”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).