Skip to main content

Class v. Carter

Citations

  • 645 P.2d 536
  • 293 Or. 147
  • 1982 Ore. LEXIS 910

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that if counterclaims were permitted in FED actions, “the object the legislature had in view— summary determination of possessory disputes — would be frustrated”
  • in an FED proceeding, “[t]he judgment is for restitution of the premises and nothing more”
  • conclusion that legislature did not intend to authorize counterclaims in commercial forcible entry and detainer (FED
  • FED proceedings are “designed to be quick and summary”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Denecke, Lent, Linde, Peterson, Campbell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Class v. Carter

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.