Skip to main content
· 8/1/1974

Fry v. DH Overmyer Co., Inc.

Citations

  • 525 P.2d 140
  • 269 Or. 281
  • 1974 Ore. LEXIS 387

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a deed absolute on its face “is what it purports to be unless and until proved otherwise by clear and convincing evidence”
  • considering, but rejecting on merits, “excusable neglect” defense to FED action
  • A deed absolute on its face “is what it purports to be unless and until proved otherwise by clear and convincing evidence.”
  • purported “telephone tender” of overdue rent made 4 days before expiration of grace period did not prevent forfeiture of lease

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tongue, McAllister

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.