Skip to main content

Clark v. State

Citations

  • 929 S.W.2d 5
  • 1996 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 69
  • 1996 WL 269198

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, when a potential juror genuinely equivocates or vacillates, the trial court may discretionarily dismiss or not “depending on demeanor, intonation, or expression”
  • explaining that trial court’s discretion “comes fully into play” when “[a] venireman . . . genuinely equivocates or vacillates in his answer” based on “demeanor, intonation, or expression”
  • a prospective juror who maintains she will consciously distort her answers must be excused on challenge for cause
  • a prospective juror who maintains she will consciously distort her answers must be excused on challenge for cause
  • a prospective juror who maintains she will consciously distort her answers must be excused on challenge for cause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clinton, Mansfield, Meyers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.