Clark v. Compania Ganadera De Cananea, S. A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• breaching party in action for breach of contract has burden of proving “conditions which would excuse their nonperformance”
• breaching party in action for breach of contract has burden of proving “conditions which would excuse their nonperformance”
• stating the 2 requirements to establish a breach of contract claim
• in a case involving breach of contract, breaching party has burden of proving “conditions which would excuse them nonperformance”
• in a case involving breach of contract, breaching party has burden of proving “conditions which would excuse their nonperformance”
• party seeking to avoid contingent obligation had the burden “to prove affirmatively the existence of conditions which would excuse 3 their nonperformance”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).