Corwin v. Gorilla Companies LLC (In Re Gorilla Companies LLC)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “the disclosure obligation is automatic—the functional equivalent of court-order[ed] interrogatories” and a failure to provide the computation therefore “cannot be justified” on the ground that the opposing party “failed to request the computation before trial”
• “Disclosing a computation of damages under Rule 26(a)(1) is necessary for the opposing party to produce responding evidence, such as an expert opinion.”
• damages should have been 21 precluded in bankruptcy trial because they were not disclosed during discovery as required 22 by Rule 26

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).