California Court of Appeal· 8/27/1968
Clark v. Carter
Citations
- 265 Cal. App. 2d 291
- 70 Cal. Rptr. 923
- 1968 Cal. App. LEXIS 1622
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reciting rule that joint tenancy may be destroyed by operation of law
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kerrigan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Knickerbocker v. CannonUtah Supreme Court· 1996-02-23· cited 39×
- Riddle v. HarmonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1980-02-25· cited 30×
- Grothe v. Cortlandt Corp.California Court of Appeal· 1992-12-22· cited 24×
- Johansen v. PeltonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1970-06-11· cited 20×
- Mitchell v. MitchellCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1999-12-20· cited 18×
- United States v. Real Property Located at Incline VillageD. Nevada· 1997-07-22· cited 14×
- Nelson v. DavisUtah Supreme Court· 1979-02-23· cited 11×
- Minonk State Bank v. GrassmanAppellate Court of Illinois· 1982-03-03· cited 11×
- Cooley v. VelingCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1973-02-13· cited 9×
- Smith v. MortonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1972-12-26· cited 7×
- Wendt v. HaneCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1987-03-03· cited 6×
- Estate of GrigsbyCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1982-08-02· cited 3×
- Carpenter v. ChandlerCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1983-03-08· cited 2×
- Grigsby v. Lloyds Bank CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1982-08-02· cited 1×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Estate of HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court· 1937-10-06· cited 73×
- Swartzbaugh v. SampsonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1936-01-27· cited 52×
- Hammond v. McArthurCalifornia Supreme Court· 1947-08-05· cited 46×
- MacHado v. MacHadoCalifornia Supreme Court· 1962-10-04· cited 46×
- McDonald v. MorleyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1940-04-23· cited 45×
- Deslauriers v. SenesacIllinois Supreme Court· 1928-10-25· cited 40×
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. NogarrCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1958-10-28· cited 35×
- Duffield v. DuffieldIllinois Supreme Court· 1915-04-22· cited 34×
- Commercial Discount Co. v. CowenCalifornia Supreme Court· 1941-09-10· cited 29×
- Reiss v. ReissCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1941-07-07· cited 20×
- Nichols v. DandoCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1940-02-19· cited 18×
- Hamel v. GootkinCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1962-03-30· cited 17×
- Teutenberg v. SchillerCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1955-12-20· cited 16×
- Donovan v. DonovanCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1963-12-23· cited 15×
- Rothney v. RothneyCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1940-11-20· cited 11×
- Hill v. DonnellyCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1942-12-28· cited 9×
- Burke v. StevensCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1968-07-15· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.