Skip to main content
· 2/25/1980

Riddle v. Harmon

Citations

  • 102 Cal. App. 3d 524
  • 162 Cal. Rptr. 530
  • 7 A.L.R. 4th 1261
  • 1980 Cal. App. LEXIS 1507

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing how the four unities operate in conjunction with the “two-to-transfer” rule, and refusing to “adher[e] to [these] cumbersome feudal law requirements”
  • recognizing how the four unities operate in conjunction with the “two-to- transfer” rule, and refusing to “adher[e] to [these] cumbersome feudal law requirements”
  • recognizing principle whereby involuntary alienation of one joint tenant’s interest severs the joint tenancy
  • discarding the “archaic rule” preventing one joint tenant from severing a joint tenancy “without the use of an intermediate device” because the rule would “defeat the clear intention of the grantor”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Poche

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.