Court of Appeals of Virginia· 10/15/2002
Clarence Jay Lynch v. Commonwealth
Citations
- 39 Va. App. 89
- 570 S.E.2d 871
- 2002 Va. App. LEXIS 618
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting the defendant’s argument that Code § 17.1-503(B) required the judge who heard his suppression motion to preside at his later trial
- upholding the changing of judges under Code § 17.1-503
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Annunziata, Bumgardner, Frank
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Anzualda v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2005-01-25· cited 54×
- Tobias Ogbanna Reed v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2018-10-16· cited 2×
- Commonwealth v. VaughanRoanoke County Circuit Court· 2014-06-02
- Jaeyoung Lee v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2026-01-13
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court· 1984-09-18· cited 9,230×
- Kyllo v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2001-06-11· cited 1,834×
- Stockton v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1984-03-09· cited 259×
- Derr v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1991-11-08· cited 214×
- Justus v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1981-10-16· cited 118×
- Deahl v. Winchester Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of Virginia· 1983-01-21· cited 60×
- Atkins v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1990-02-27· cited 40×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.