Clarence Jay Lynch v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the defendant’s argument that Code § 17.1-503(B) required the judge who heard his suppression motion to preside at his later trial
• upholding the changing of judges under Code § 17.1-503

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).