Skip to main content

Chunn v. Chunn

Citations

  • 929 S.W.2d 490
  • 1996 Tex. App. LEXIS 4076
  • 1996 WL 509866

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[W]e have repeatedly stressed that procedural rules should be construed and applied so that the right of appeal is not unnecessarily lost to technicalities.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schneider, Hedges, Andell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.