Skip to main content
· 7/14/1997

Keesecker v. Bird

Citations

  • 490 S.E.2d 754
  • 200 W. Va. 667
  • 1997 W. Va. LEXIS 302

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The circuit court, on remand, should determine and evaluate the factual circumstances and address this legal question in the first instance.”
  • “An interpretation of the West Virginia Rules of Civil Procedure presents a question of law subject to a de novo review.”
  • “Mr. Keesecker is undoubtedly the owner of the remainder interest in MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS [ECF NO. 10] the life estate property” and, thus, “is a real party in interest entitled to pursue his action for waste.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Starcher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.