· 7/14/1997
Keesecker v. Bird
Citations
- 490 S.E.2d 754
- 200 W. Va. 667
- 1997 W. Va. LEXIS 302
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The circuit court, on remand, should determine and evaluate the factual circumstances and address this legal question in the first instance.”
- “An interpretation of the West Virginia Rules of Civil Procedure presents a question of law subject to a de novo review.”
- “Mr. Keesecker is undoubtedly the owner of the remainder interest in MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS [ECF NO. 10] the life estate property” and, thus, “is a real party in interest entitled to pursue his action for waste.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Starcher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.