Christopher Andre Vialva v. T. J. Watson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[A] § 2241 proceeding is not an authorized way to contest the procedure the Fifth Circuit used.\
• \[W]e do not sit in judgment on the decisions of our sister circuits. That power belongs to the Supreme Court.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Yorie Von Kahl v. M. Segal
  Seventh Circuit· 2021-12-06· cited 9×

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lindh v. Murphy
  Supreme Court· 1997-06-23· cited 4,248×
• Nken v. Holder
  Supreme Court· 2009-04-22· cited 3,500×
• Buck v. Davis
  Supreme Court· 2017-02-22· cited 2,697×
• Felker v. Turpin
  Supreme Court· 1996-06-28· cited 1,437×
• United States v. Hayman
  Supreme Court· 1952-01-07· cited 1,034×
• In Re James Davenport and Sherman Nichols
  Seventh Circuit· 1998-06-18· cited 613×
• Aaron Lindh v. James P. Murphy, Warden
  Seventh Circuit· 1996-09-12· cited 550×
• Swain v. Pressley
  Supreme Court· 1977-03-22· cited 503×
• Bruce Carneil Webster v. Charles A. Daniels
  Seventh Circuit· 2015-05-01· cited 222×
• United States v. Christopher Vialva
  Fifth Circuit· 2014-08-11· cited 58×
• United States v. Vialva
  Fifth Circuit· 2018-09-14· cited 22×
• Vialva v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2016-02-29· cited 4×
• Vialva v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2020-01-13· cited 2×

Other cases named Christopher Andre Vialva v. T. J. Watson

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Christopher Andre Vialva v. T. J. Watson
  Seventh Circuit· 2020-09-18