Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Sixth Circuit· 8/3/1995

Christophel v. Kukulinsky

Citations

  • 61 F.3d 479
  • 1995 WL 455697

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “[u]nclassified civil servants [under Ohio law] have no property right to continued employment”
  • “A defendant’s right to appeal the denial of qualified immunity does not turn on the phrasing of the district court’s order.”
  • “A defendant’s right to appeal the denial of qualified immunity does not turn on the phrasing of the district court’s order.”
  • “A defendant’s right to appeal the denial of qualified immunity does not turn on the phrasing of the district court’s order.”
  • “[T]he deprivation of property by state action is not itself unconstitutional; what is unconstitutional is the deprivation of such an interest without due process of law.”
  • “Finally, unclassified civil servants have no property right to continued employment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Joiner, Martin, Siler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

51 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Christophel v. Kukulinsky

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.