Donald Bennett v. City of Eastpointe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that in reviewing a summary judgment motion, “the evidence should be viewed in the light most favorable to the non-moving party”
• holding that in reviewing a summary judgment motion, \the evidence should be viewed in the light most favorable to the non-moving party\
• holding that a police officer who ordered bicycle riders to leave an affluent suburb and escorted them across the municipal boundary had conducted a seizure
• holding that in reviewing a summary judgment motion, “the evidence should be viewed in the light most favorable to the non-moving party”
• concluding that defendants were not entitled to qualified immunity because performing a pat-down search where there was no indication that plaintiffs were “armed and dangerous” was “objectively unreasonable”
• noting that detention in the patrol car was unwarranted where, inter alia, the police had already searched and handcuffed the suspects

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).